Switching iterator type to auto

[waffle2k]

No effective change, simply changing some of the type declarations to "auto" in the test file

[ekg]

I've just begun using auto myself in another project, and it's great. I'd love to pull it in here, but I'm worried that there are still a lot of projects that might be stuck in previous C++99. What do you think?

[thomas-riccardi]

I am one of the users of intervaltree on C++99.
Branching for C++99 maintenance and going forward on master with C++11/14 would not be an issue for me, and since not much happens on this lib, the maintenance burden wound not be much.

[scchess]

Me two. I'm using C++11 as well.

[sliedes]

FWIW, it won't compile as C++99 anyway because of at least unique_ptr. Not that I would want it to, but if you use unique_ptr, there's probably no reason to not use auto.

[ekg]

Cool looks like we should switch.

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016, 21:28 Sami Liedes notifications@github.com wrote:

FWIW, it won't compile as C++99 anyway because of at least unique_ptr. Not
that I would want it to, but if you use unique_ptr, there's probably no
reason to not use auto.

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3 (comment)