Optimize Range.disjoint?/2 empty checks - #15639
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Detect valid empty ranges with direction comparisons instead of computing their exact sizes. Benchmarks average 18% faster across tested paths (7%-28%). Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-5
josevalim
reviewed
Jul 20, 2026
josevalim
reviewed
Jul 20, 2026
Pass valid range fields directly to an inline three-arity helper. Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-5
Contributor
Author
|
@josevalim thank you for the rewrite! |
Member
|
💚 💙 💜 💛 ❤️ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-5
Detect valid empty ranges with direction comparisons instead of computing their exact sizes. Benchmarks average 18% faster across tested paths (7%-28%).