-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
refactor: Remove unused confusing code #463
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
DistributionType is incomplete, but removing numPartitions is not going to fix that. It needs more information about partitioning. It looks like @hdikeman is wrapping up Connector API changes for Table Write and I should have bandwidth to work on adding TableWrite support to the optimizer. As part of that work I expect to come and revisit DistributionType struct.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I made it complete in different PR, where partitioning is a function.
But it's quite nontrivial PR that contains different parts, so I decided to start with simple part.
Number of partitions not needed, because count of partitions controlled by optimizer options (numDrivers/numWorkers) when we plan partition.
And it doesn't needed for broadcast/gather, because they have specific behavior.
The only case where is it needed it's write table, but for this case it should be implemented in more abstract way with partition type/function (that internally have number of buckets for hive for an example).
Also table scan, but it's not implement partitioning now
About @hdikeman work, I have PR that implements TableWrite in optimizer, I plan to rebase it after Henry PR with connector api changes will be merged.
So this PR will contains implementation for TableWrite in optimizer.
It will be for TestConnector and for LocalHiveConnectorMetadata but with copartition for hive disabled because it requires some changes in runner.
Does it sounds ok to you?