Enforce strict tool usage for weather_time_agent

[vinodnextcoder]

This change rigorously enforces the agent's STRICT REFUSAL RULE. By limiting the agent's capabilities to only time and weather retrieval, we eliminate the risk of the LLM overriding the system instructions to answer off-topic queries using the general search tool. This ensures the agent behaves predictably and adheres strictly to its defined single purpose.

[google-cla]

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @vinodnextcoder, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request strengthens the weather_time_agent's adherence to its defined role by implementing a rigorous refusal rule. By making the agent's instructions more explicit about its singular focus on time and weather queries, it prevents the underlying Large Language Model from misinterpreting or overriding system instructions to engage with off-topic questions using general search capabilities, thereby ensuring predictable and focused agent behavior.

Highlights

• Agent Instruction Enhancement: The weather_time_agent's instruction has been updated to explicitly state its sole purpose of answering questions about time and weather, and to strictly refuse any unrelated queries.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request strengthens the weather_time_agent's instructions to focus solely on time and weather queries. The new instruction is clear and direct. However, there's a discrepancy between the PR's goal to 'eliminate the risk' of off-topic answers and the implementation. The agent retains the general-purpose GoogleSearch tool, meaning the restriction relies entirely on the model's adherence to the prompt, which isn't guaranteed. While this change is a positive step, true enforcement would involve restricting the toolset to only what's necessary for its defined function.