-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
chore(actions): address zizmor findings #836
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
g-husam
wants to merge
4
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
zizmor-cleanup
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a59fa1d
chore(actions): address zizmor findings
g-husam 46cb6e0
chore(renovate): replace config:base/recommended with best-practices
g-husam c6aa528
chore(actions): address zizmor unpinned findings
g-husam 3a7e6a5
chore(actions): address zizmor security and container pinning findings
g-husam File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why don't we just pin these? I don't particularly like annotations for a tool I don't use. Alternatively we can just ignore them without the annotation, as this tool is not being run regularly on CI (or is it?)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My thinking was that 1P deps (like googleapis or GCP or anything maintained by google and updated frequently) can be kept on latest (if repo owners prefer), for convenience. But if you prefer, can pin them. My assumption was that when depending on a shared workflow/image for builds, you are prob ok with always pulling the latest iff its a "trusted" 1P source, as they will prob be updated somewhat frequently and safer to be on latest than an old one.
But ofc these are all assumptions :) so lmk what you prefer.
I think it will run on every PR once fully enforced
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since we are enabling config:best-practices for Renovate in this PR, Renovate will automatically keep the SHAs up to date for us anyway. I agree with Brent that we should pin those 1P workflows and images to SHAs so we can get rid of the inline zizmor annotations entirely.
Otherwise looks great. Thanks for addressing the
zizmorsecurity findings and hardening our GitHub Actions.A few highlights I appreciate here:
permissions: contents: readwhere they were previously absent.persist-credentials.config:best-practicesRenovate update to ensure the SHAs stay up to date.zizmorignores for the trustedGoogleCloudPlatform/php-toolsreusable workflows.