Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

This PR refactors the advanced service checks in the classroom directory to be more concise and robust, using a simplified check for the top-level Classroom object and its Courses property. This change ensures that the type checker can correctly infer the existence of the necessary properties while improving code readability.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 17360807705286247641 started by @jpoehnelt

Refactors the advanced service checks in the classroom directory to be more concise and robust.

- Replaces the individual property checks with a single check for the top-level `Classroom` object and its `Courses` property.
- Ensures that the type checker can correctly infer the existence of the necessary properties.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

@jpoehnelt jpoehnelt changed the title refactor(classroom): simplify advanced service checks fix(classroom): resolve type errors Nov 21, 2025
@jpoehnelt jpoehnelt self-assigned this Nov 21, 2025
@jpoehnelt jpoehnelt marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2025 23:05
Copy link
Member

@jpoehnelt jpoehnelt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In activateById, changing the parameter type to number and removing parseInt might be a breaking change if the function is called with a string ID. Please revert to accepting a string and parsing it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant