Skip to content

Conversation

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Jan 24, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
nextest-metadata workspace.dependencies minor 0.12.2 -> 0.13.0

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

nextest-rs/nextest (nextest-metadata)

v0.13.2: nextest-metadata 0.13.2

Compare Source

Added
  • NextestExitCode::RERUN_TESTS_OUTSTANDING indicates that all tests passed during a rerun, but there are still outstanding tests that were known to have failed earlier.
  • For test filtering, MismatchReason::RerunAlreadyPassed, indicating that the test run already passed.
  • With the proptest1 feature, impl Arbitrary for TestCaseName.

v0.13.1: nextest-metadata 0.13.1

Compare Source

Added
  • New proptest1 feature enables proptest Arbitrary implementations for RustBinaryId and MismatchReason.

v0.13.0: nextest-metadata 0.13.0

Compare Source

Changed
  • A new TestCaseName newtype wraps test case identifiers, providing type safety and utility methods:

    • components() splits the name on :: to yield module path components.
    • module_path_and_name() extracts the module path prefix and trailing name.
  • RustTestCaseSummary now includes a kind field of type Option<RustTestKind>, distinguishing between tests (#[test]) and benchmarks (#[bench]). This field is None when parsing output from older nextest versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge January 24, 2026 07:42
@hash-worker hash-worker bot requested a review from a team January 24, 2026 07:42
@cursor
Copy link

cursor bot commented Jan 24, 2026

PR Summary

Dependency update

  • Updates nextest-metadata to 0.13.0 in Cargo.toml.
  • No application/source code changes included.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 1969a53. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Jan 24, 2026
@augmentcode
Copy link

augmentcode bot commented Jan 24, 2026

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the workspace Rust dependency nextest-metadata from 0.12.2 to 0.13.0.
Why: Keeps the repo aligned with newer nextest metadata APIs/schema changes introduced in the 0.13.x line.

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

Copy link

@augmentcode augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. 1 suggestions posted.

Fix All in Augment

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

nextest-filtering = { version = "0.17.0", default-features = false }
nextest-metadata = { version = "0.12.2", default-features = false }
nextest-metadata = { version = "0.13.0", default-features = false }
nodejs_package_json = { version = "0.4.4" }
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This bump likely needs a corresponding Cargo.lock update (CI runs cargo update --workspace --locked and will fail if the lockfile isn't already consistent with the new nextest-metadata requirement).

Fix This in Augment

🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Merging this PR will create unknown performance changes

⏩ 18 skipped benchmarks1
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run2


Comparing deps/rs/nextest-metadata-0.x (1969a53) with main (9125fd4)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 18 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. 12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.19%. Comparing base (9125fd4) to head (1969a53).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8315   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.19%   60.19%           
=======================================
  Files        1232     1232           
  Lines      118007   118007           
  Branches     5135     5135           
=======================================
+ Hits        71030    71031    +1     
+ Misses      46151    46150    -1     
  Partials      826      826           
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.18% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
rust.harpc-tower 66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 2.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 81.77% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/rs/nextest-metadata-0.x branch from 2892271 to 1969a53 Compare January 25, 2026 23:15
@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor Author

hash-worker bot commented Jan 25, 2026

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock
Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path Cargo.toml --package [email protected] --precise 0.13.3
    Updating crates.io index
error: failed to select a version for the requirement `nextest-metadata = "^0.12.3"`
candidate versions found which didn't match: 0.13.3
location searched: crates.io index
required by package `nextest-filtering v0.17.0`
    ... which satisfies dependency `nextest-filtering = "^0.17.0"` of package `hashql-compiletest v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/libs/@local/hashql/compiletest)`
    ... which satisfies path dependency `hashql-compiletest` (locked to 0.0.0) of package `hashql-ast v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/libs/@local/hashql/ast)`
    ... which satisfies path dependency `hashql-ast` (locked to 0.0.0) of package `hash-graph-api v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/libs/@local/graph/api)`
    ... which satisfies path dependency `hash-graph-api` (locked to 0.0.0) of package `hash-graph v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/apps/hash-graph)`

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 25, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jan 25, 2026 11:19pm
hashdotdesign-tokens Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jan 25, 2026 11:19pm

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$27.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.311 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.777 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$13.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.173 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$42.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.840 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.657 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$23.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.662 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$26.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-39.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 48.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-81.899 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 118 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-52.177 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.648 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.708 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.870 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.026 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.437 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$3.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.581 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.012 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$3.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.461 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$39.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.443 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$76.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 494 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.980 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$43.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.543 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$45.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.932 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$53.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.674 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$41.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.732 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$420 \mathrm{ms} \pm 811 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.328 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$99.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 440 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$85.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 322 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.138 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$271 \mathrm{ms} \pm 695 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-15.831 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.799 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$18.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.626 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.258 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.548 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.831 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$22.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.577 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.655 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.470 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$30.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.105 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.817 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.057 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 395 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$8.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.468 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$47.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.747 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$95.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 481 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$53.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.405 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$60.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.010 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$70.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 526 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$76.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 398 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$50.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$78.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$58.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$65.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$66.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$67.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 363 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 564 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.181 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$132 \mathrm{ms} \pm 626 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.768 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$40.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$591 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.06 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}4.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area)

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants