Update Rust crate tokio to v1.49.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
tokio (source)	workspace.dependencies	minor	1.48.0 -> 1.49.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

tokio-rs/tokio (tokio)

v1.49.0: Tokio v1.49.0

Compare Source

1.49.0 (January 3rd, 2026)

Added

• net: add support for TCLASS option on IPv6 (#​7781)
• runtime: stabilize runtime::id::Id (#​7125)
• task: implement Extend for JoinSet (#​7195)
• task: stabilize the LocalSet::id() (#​7776)

Changed

• net: deprecate {TcpStream,TcpSocket}::set_linger (#​7752)

Fixed

• macros: fix the hygiene issue of join! and try_join! (#​7766)
• runtime: revert "replace manual vtable definitions with Wake" (#​7699)
• sync: return TryRecvError::Disconnected from Receiver::try_recv after Receiver::close (#​7686)
• task: remove unnecessary trait bounds on the Debug implementation (#​7720)

Unstable

• fs: handle EINTR in fs::write for io-uring (#​7786)
• fs: support io-uring with tokio::fs::read (#​7696)
• runtime: disable io-uring on EPERM (#​7724)
• time: add alternative timer for better multicore scalability (#​7467)

Documented

• docs: fix a typos in bounded.rs and park.rs (#​7817)
• io: add SyncIoBridge cross-references to copy and copy_buf (#​7798)
• io: doc that AsyncWrite does not inherit from std::io::Write (#​7705)
• metrics: clarify that num_alive_tasks is not strongly consistent (#​7614)
• net: clarify the cancellation safety of the TcpStream::peek (#​7305)
• net: clarify the drop behavior of unix::OwnedWriteHalf (#​7742)
• net: clarify the platform-dependent backlog in TcpSocket docs (#​7738)
• runtime: mention LocalRuntime in new_current_thread docs (#​7820)
• sync: add missing period to mpsc::Sender::try_send docs (#​7721)
• sync: clarify the cancellation safety of oneshot::Receiver (#​7780)
• sync: improve the docs for the errors of mpsc (#​7722)
• task: add example for spawn_local usage on local runtime (#​7689)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Minor dependency update.

• Bumps tokio from 1.48.0 to 1.49.0 in Cargo.lock (checksum updated)
• No source code changes included

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit c9b1c33. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust async runtime dependency tokio from 1.48.0 to 1.49.0.

Changes: Regenerates the workspace lockfile (Cargo.lock) to reflect the new Tokio version and its resolved transitive dependencies.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

_{Comparing deps/rs/tokio-1.x-lockfile (c9b1c33) with main (9125fd4)}

Summary

✅ 18 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run¹

Footnotes

1. 12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.702 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.959 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.333 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.766 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 138 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.116 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-41.015 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-82.958 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-62.452 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.034 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.175 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.811 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.508 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.545 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.228 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.234 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$39.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.086 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$77.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 498 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.307 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.428 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$53.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 154 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.524 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$423 \mathrm{ms} \pm 770 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.138 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$95.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 455 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$84.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 380 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.097 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$264 \mathrm{ms} \pm 613 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-15.154 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.360 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.781 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.737 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.721 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 131 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.685 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.034 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 221 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.463 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.143 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.897 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.005 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$46.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$94.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 445 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$52.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.546 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 367 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$75.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 377 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$49.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.290 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$77.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 401 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$57.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.271 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.273 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.943 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 620 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.068 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 695 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.888 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$39.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-67.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$579 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.16 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.985 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph