Update clap Rust crates to v4.5.56

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
clap	workspace.dependencies	patch	4.5.54 -> 4.5.56
clap_builder	workspace.dependencies	patch	4.5.54 -> 4.5.56

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

clap-rs/clap (clap)

v4.5.56

Compare Source

Fixes

• On conflict error, don't show conflicting arguments in the usage

v4.5.55

Compare Source

Fixes

• Fix inconsistency in precedence between positionals with a value_terminator("--") and escapes (--) where ./foo -- bar means the first arg is empty, rather than escaping future args

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Review	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jan 29, 2026 5:00pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jan 29, 2026 5:00pm

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Patch-level dependency bumps only; risk is limited to potential CLI parsing behavior changes from clap updates, with no application logic modifications.

Overview
Updates the lockfile to newer clap patch releases (clap/clap_builder to 4.5.56, clap_derive to 4.5.55).

This also refreshes several transitive windows-sys version pins across dependencies (mixed downgrades/upgrades) as part of the lockfile resolution.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3f99555. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This Renovate PR bumps the Rust CLI parsing dependencies to the latest patch release.

Changes:

• Updated clap from 4.5.54 to 4.5.55
• Updated clap_builder from 4.5.54 to 4.5.55
• Refreshed the workspace lockfile accordingly

Technical Notes: The upstream release fixes a precedence inconsistency involving positionals with value_terminator("--") and -- escapes, which may subtly change how certain argv sequences are interpreted.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 14.43%

⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
✅ 15 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run¹

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	complex	18.3 µs	16.3 µs	+11.93%
⚡	diamond	12.4 µs	10.8 µs	+14.43%
⚡	linear	7.8 µs	7 µs	+11.53%

---

_{Comparing deps/rs/clap-rust-crates (3f99555) with main (c8af0f6)²}

Footnotes

1. 12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩

2. No successful run was found on main (7071640) during the generation of this report, so c8af0f6 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.11%. Comparing base (3e0af02) to head (3f99555).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8337   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.11%   60.11%           
=======================================
  Files        1235     1235           
  Lines      118164   118164           
  Branches     5173     5173           
=======================================
+ Hits        71029    71032    +3     
+ Misses      46309    46306    -3     
  Partials      826      826           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.19% <ø> (+0.04%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.77% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.103 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.553 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.720 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-37.666 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-82.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-48.538 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.624 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.271 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.116 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$41.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$78.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$45.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.284 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$48.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 253 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$56.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$42.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.421 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$419 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.01 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$97.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 454 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.692 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$87.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 353 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$286 \mathrm{ms} \pm 691 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.589 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$23.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.715 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.599 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.660 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 325 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.398 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.946 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.745 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$31.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.852 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$47.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 244 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$95.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 391 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.802 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$53.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 210 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.569 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.023 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$71.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 418 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.648 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$76.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 355 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.455 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$51.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.589 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$79.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 442 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.980 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$58.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 372 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 405 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.520 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 418 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.690 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 561 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$144 \mathrm{ms} \pm 737 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$41.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-61.517 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$581 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.13 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.735 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph