Repository navigation
Measure against the November 2026 models and add four registers (1.4.0) - #11
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The same titles as the September texts, written by Claude Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6.1 for training, and by Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, Fable 5.2, GPT-6.1 and GPT-6.1 Terra on the held-out titles, in the three registers. gensamples.py writes them and records model, date and prompt in a manifest.
…noise JUDGE and GPT_MODEL choose the judges, each with its own cache entries. Sets can point at human originals in ~/corpus and run without notes. report.py --noise prints the spread between judges and between reps of one snapshot.
…a Spanish check The band files take their AI medians and directions from the September and November training texts together; the human edges stay. practical, quietly, deliberate and preserve pass the lexicon rule on the November posts. E4 flags bold labels on list items in Spanish. Held-out human texts fail no more often than before, and in Spanish less often on C1 (7% to 5%).
… ship numbers.md, spanish.md, word-choice.md and pattern 8 carry the figures for the current models, and SKILL.md drops the claims they no longer support. Three instructions measured end to end and the rejected checks are in numbers.md and in the ledger.
Four registers measured in November 2026. build-corpus-work.sh fetches the human texts, all from before ChatGPT: merged pull request descriptions, long commit messages and READMEs from the GitHub API, and Enron emails from AESLC. The assistant texts are written from the same titles by the current models. Held-out human texts pass the checklist clean 97% to 100% of the time; GPT-6.1 drafts 0% to 43%, Claude drafts 67% to 100%. A band file can now leave a feature out with _skip: the Enron emails have no paragraph breaks.
ilien-dev
force-pushed
the
feature/current-model-patterns
branch
from
November 12, 2026 17:46
2cd8371 to
041a565
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Version 1.4.0 measures the skill against the models people use in November 2026 and adds four registers. The checklist and the meter change. The rewrite instructions do not, because the three new ones tried here did not clear the noise on held-out titles.
New assistant texts
The September texts in
eval/ai/have no record of which model version wrote them. The same titles were written again by Claude Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6.1 for training, and by Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, Fable 5.2, GPT-6.1 and GPT-6.1 Terra on the held-out titles: 282 texts in blog, fiction and Spanish.eval/gensamples.pywrites them andMANIFEST.tsvrecords model, date and prompt for each.On those texts the checklist catches less of each new Claude model. It failed every Sonnet blog post from September and now passes 79% of the Sonnet 5.5 ones clean, 79% of Opus 5.5 and 93% of Fable 5.2. Dashes are no longer a Claude signal: 7% to 29% of the new Claude posts have one, against 22% of held-out human posts.
What changed in the meter and the checklist
After these, 71% of Opus 5.5 blog posts pass clean, 57% of Sonnet 5.5 and 93% of Fable 5.2.
SKILL.mdnow says that a clean checklist on a Claude draft says little.Rewrites made with the new files were judged like the ones before, on the development titles, the held-out ones and the Spanish set (differences from -2.3 to +0.5 points, none significant).
Four new registers
scripts/build-corpus-work.shfetches human texts from before ChatGPT, and the November models wrote theirs from the same titles.bands-pr.jsonbands-commit.jsonbands-readme.jsonbands-email.jsonThe held-out assistant groups have 5 to 9 texts per model. Only texts of about 130 words and up are in the corpora, so the two-line commit message is not measured. The Enron subject lines and mailbox names are not in the repository; the email texts are numbered. The rewrite rules were not run end to end in these registers.
What was measured and left out
All of it is in
references/numbers.mdand in the ledger (20 new entries).For the next round
The end-to-end harness can run on a cheaper panel:
JUDGE=claude-sonnet-5-5 GPT_MODEL=gpt-6.1-terra. Both judges order human posts, rewrites and drafts as Opus does (r = 0.96 for Sonnet).report.py --noiseprints how far one version moves by itself. Between two reps the set mean moved by up to 3.1 points, so a smaller difference between versions is not a result.The local human corpora were rebuilt since September (159 blog posts measure, against 167), and the November figures are on those.