fix(tokens): shape used on otp and textarea - #31474
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
BenOsodrac
added
package: react
BenOsodrac
requested review from
brandyscarney
and removed request for
OS-jacobbell
September 23, 2026 14:46
brandyscarney
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2026
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue number: internal
What is the new behavior?
Port of #31470 and #31473 (merged on
before-next) tonext. Replaces #31471.$ion-shape-soft-lginstead of$ion-shape-soft-xl.$ion-shape-soft-lginstead of$ion-shape-soft-xl.The round input OTP shape keeps
$ion-shape-round-xl(changed in #31470 and reverted in #31473).Snapshots: the 12 updated screenshots are carried over from
before-next. Their baseline was identical on both branches, so no regeneration is needed.Does this introduce a breaking change?
🤖 Generated with Claude Code