-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 637
📦 Add pip-supported extra for upper bound
#2257
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ repository = "https://github.com/jazzband/pip-tools" | |||||
| changelog = "https://github.com/jazzband/pip-tools/releases" | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| [project.optional-dependencies] | ||||||
| supported-pip = [ | ||||||
| "pip < 25.3", | ||||||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Since #2253 merged, this should probably be:
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Should this include a lower bound as well?
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The lower bound is already present among mandatory runtime deps. See #2257 (comment). There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ok. It's only the updated There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @webknjaz This thread has been resolved, but the suggestion had not been applied, and the version dependency has not been changed in any other way.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Looks like @sirosen marked it as resolved too early. I'll unresolve.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ah, my mistake, sorry! I thought the conversation was done and didn't realize the initial suggestion was still pending.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, I didn't want to rush with discussions ongoing + other efforts being prioritized.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, I didn't want to rush with discussions ongoing + other efforts being prioritized. |
||||||
| ] | ||||||
| testing = [ | ||||||
| "pytest >= 7.2.0", | ||||||
| "pytest-rerunfailures", | ||||||
|
|
||||||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.