Skip to content

Conversation

@rhigdon
Copy link

@rhigdon rhigdon commented Sep 25, 2025

this will help decouple the realms attributes and allow reuse in modules
without relying on the entire realm configuration.

@rhigdon rhigdon force-pushed the issue-1111-realm-attributes-resource branch 2 times, most recently from 9d977c0 to 1c97b93 Compare October 1, 2025 15:15
@sschu
Copy link
Contributor

sschu commented Oct 5, 2025

@rhigdon I think if we add this, we should offer both options as mutually exclusive. If we removed the current way, we would need a state migration and also ask everybody to adapt their configuration so this would be quite a breaking change.

@rhigdon
Copy link
Author

rhigdon commented Oct 6, 2025

@rhigdon I think if we add this, we should offer both options as mutually exclusive. If we removed the current way, we would need a state migration and also ask everybody to adapt their configuration so this would be quite a breaking change.

That sounds good to me. Thanks for the direction on this!

@rhigdon rhigdon force-pushed the issue-1111-realm-attributes-resource branch from 1c97b93 to 83e38a6 Compare October 9, 2025 15:39
this will help decouple the realms attributes and allow reuse in modules
 without relying on the entire realm configuration.  use is mutually
 exclusive between this resource and the realm attributes

Signed-off-by: Ryan H <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants