-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
refactor: simplify role.go route definitions to reduce duplication #80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Welcome @kearen001! It looks like this is your first PR to kubeedge/dashboard 🎉 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @kearen001, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on improving the internal structure and clarity of the API route definitions related to roles. It introduces a more modular and less repetitive way to declare routes, making the codebase cleaner and more robust for future development without altering any existing functionality.
Highlights
- Code Refactoring: The primary goal of this pull request is to refactor the route definitions within
role.goto enhance maintainability and reduce code duplication. This is a cleanup effort with no functional changes. - Helper Functions for Route Options: Reusable helper functions (
WithParam,WithReads,WithWrites,WithReturns,WithDoc) have been introduced to encapsulate commonrestful.RouteBuilderconfigurations, making route definitions more concise. - Centralized Route Registration: A new
addRoutefunction has been implemented to centralize the logic for dynamically creating and registering routes based on HTTP method and a variadic list of options. This significantly simplifies theaddRoleRoutesmethod. - Improved Readability and Maintainability: By abstracting common patterns into helper functions and a single registration method, the code for defining API routes is now easier to read, extend, and maintain.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the route definitions in role.go to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability by introducing a set of helper functions. The changes make the code cleaner and easier to read. My review includes one suggestion to improve the robustness of the new addRoute helper function by handling unsupported HTTP methods more strictly, preventing potential silent failures.
modules/api/pkg/handler/role.go
Outdated
| default: | ||
| // 保守回退为 GET(或者根据需要 panic/返回 error) | ||
| rb = ws.GET(path).To(handler) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The default case in this switch statement silently falls back to creating a GET route for any unsupported HTTP method. This can lead to subtle bugs that are hard to track down if a developer accidentally provides an incorrect or unsupported method string. It's better to fail fast in such cases.
Since this function is part of the application setup, panicking is an appropriate way to signal a programming error immediately.
| default: | |
| // 保守回退为 GET(或者根据需要 panic/返回 error) | |
| rb = ws.GET(path).To(handler) | |
| default: | |
| panic("unsupported HTTP method: " + method) |
Signed-off-by: kearen001 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: kearen001 <[email protected]>
ff4ea70 to
56e5de8
Compare
ghosind
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
cc @wbc6080 @Shelley-BaoYue
modules/api/pkg/handler/role.go
Outdated
| "github.com/kubeedge/dashboard/errors" | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| // --- Route helper 定义 --- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please write comments in English
modules/api/pkg/handler/role.go
Outdated
| o(rb) | ||
| } | ||
| ws.Route(rb) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should move these functions to another file to make them reusable
|
@kearen001: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Refactor
role.goroute definitions to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.Param,Writes,Readsinto reusable helper functions.addRoutemethod.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
NONE
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
NONE