Skip to content

Conversation

@sivchari
Copy link
Member

@sivchari sivchari commented Nov 5, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Part of #12720

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 5, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sbueringer for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from vincepri November 5, 2025 11:27
@sivchari
Copy link
Member Author

sivchari commented Nov 5, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-latestk8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-mink8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-upgrade-1-34-1-35-main

@sivchari
Copy link
Member Author

sivchari commented Nov 6, 2025

/retest

@sivchari
Copy link
Member Author

sivchari commented Nov 6, 2025

/cc @fabriziopandini @sbueringer

Comment on lines +60 to +62
upgrade:
external:
generateUpgradePlanExtension: generate-upgrade-plan.${EXTENSION_CONFIG_NAME:-k8s-upgrade-with-runtimesdk}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sivchari if I got this right, this is the only difference between the test introduced by this PR and the existing runtime SDK test.

If this is correct, considering that this test takes long, I would be ok if we move this change to clusterclass-quick-start-runtimesdk and have only one test (I'm also considering that we have good test coverage for the different ways of computing upgrade plan, and that the runtime extension internally uses the same func we use when only kubernetes versions are set).

wdyt?
@sbueringer opinions?

Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer Nov 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good. Let's just add this to the clusterclass-quick-start-runtimesdk ClusterClass and revert the rest of the changes on this PR

@sivchari Sorry we didn't think about this when writing up the tasks

@sbueringer sbueringer added the area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing label Nov 7, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label Nov 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants