-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 618
feat: Add Reasoning features for openai compatibility #1958
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @chupark, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new 'Reasoning effort' feature for OpenAI-compatible models. The changes include adding a new configuration option in the provider settings to enable reasoning support and a corresponding parameter rule in the LLM logic to control the reasoning effort level. The implementation is straightforward. I've identified a couple of minor areas for improvement regarding the new parameter's requirement status and a grammatical correction in a user-facing label. Overall, a good addition to enhance model capabilities.
Related Issues or Context
This PR contains Changes to Non-Plugin
This PR contains Changes to Non-LLM Models Plugin
This PR contains Changes to LLM Models Plugin
[ Add Reasoning Support on Model Authentication modal ]

Before
After

[ Add effort on LLM Node modal ]

Before
After

[ Thinking ]
[ No Thinking ]

Version Control (Any Changes to the Plugin Will Require Bumping the Version)
VersionField, Not in Meta Section)Dify Plugin SDK Version
I have Ensured
dify_plugin>=0.3.0,<0.6.0is in requirements.txt (SDK docs)Environment Verification (If Any Code Changes)
Local Deployment Environment
SaaS Environment