fix: update work item configuration to use repro steps for Bug child … - #1523
Open
Dan Hellem (danhellem) wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
fix: update work item configuration to use repro steps for Bug child …#1523Dan Hellem (danhellem) wants to merge 1 commit into
Dan Hellem (danhellem) wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.Scanned FilesNone |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request updates the logic for assigning description fields when creating child work items, ensuring that bug work items use the correct field for repro steps. It also adds comprehensive tests to verify this behavior.
Work item field assignment improvements:
configureWorkItemToolsso that for work items of type "Bug", the description is added to theMicrosoft.VSTS.TCM.ReproStepsfield, while for other types, it remains inSystem.Description. The correct multiline format field is also set depending on the work item type. [1] [2]Testing enhancements:
ReproStepsfield and notSystem.Description, and that the multiline format is only set for Markdown-formatted bugs.GitHub issue number
#1521
Associated Risks
N/A
✅ PR Checklist
🧪 How did you test it?
Manually tested and updated auto tests