fix: skip gpu init for streaming node

[foxspy]

issue: #45597

The streaming node currently cannot use GPU resources and does not need to perform initialization.

[sre-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: foxspy
To complete the pull request process, please assign congqixia after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @congqixia in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[sre-ci-robot]

[ci-v2-notice]
Notice: We are gradually rolling out the new ci-v2 system.

• Legacy CI jobs remain unaffected, you can just ignore ci-v2 if you don't want to run it.
• Additional "ci-v2/*" checkers will run for this PR to ensure the new ci-v2 system is working as expected.
• For tests that exist in both v1 and v2, passing in either system is considered PASS.

To rerun ci-v2 checks, comment with:

• /ci-rerun-code-check // for ci-v2/code-check
• /ci-rerun-build // for ci-v2/build
• /ci-rerun-ut-integration // for ci-v2/ut-integration
• /ci-rerun-ut-go // for ci-v2/ut-go
• /ci-rerun-ut-cpp // for ci-v2/ut-cpp
• /ci-rerun-ut // for all ci-v2/ut-integration, ci-v2/ut-go, ci-v2/ut-cpp
• /ci-rerun-e2e-arm // for ci-v2/e2e-arm

If you have any questions or requests, please contact @zhikunyao.

[mergify]

@foxspy go-sdk check failed, comment rerun go-sdk can trigger the job again.

[mergify]

@foxspy cpu-e2e job failed, comment /run-cpu-e2e can trigger the job again.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 41.33%. Comparing base (947c885) to head (fd7a555).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
internal/util/initcore/query_node.go	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (0.00%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.
❌ Your project check has failed because the head coverage (41.33%) is below the target coverage (77.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (947c885) and HEAD (fd7a555). Click for more details.

HEAD has 4 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (947c885)	HEAD (fd7a555)
	6	2

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #45650       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   76.51%   41.33%   -35.18%     
===========================================
  Files        1875     1218      -657     
  Lines      292805   192616   -100189     
===========================================
- Hits       224039    79624   -144415     
- Misses      61337   112657    +51320     
+ Partials     7429      335     -7094     

Components	Coverage Δ
Client	∅ <ø> (∅)
Core	83.19% <ø> (ø)
Go	9.52% <0.00%> (-65.12%)	⬇️

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
internal/util/initcore/query_node.go	0.00% <0.00%> (-78.23%)	⬇️

... and 1281 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[mergify]

@foxspy cpu-e2e job failed, comment /run-cpu-e2e can trigger the job again.