Skip to content

Conversation

@v-shobhit
Copy link
Contributor

Adding gpt-oss-120b reference implementation.
This uses SGLang backend to serve gpt-oss-120b model. Scripts are provided to run this in Offline/Server scenario in PerformanceOnly/AccuracyOnly modes.

mrmhodak
mrmhodak previously approved these changes Dec 16, 2025
*.Server.target_qps = 1.0
*.Offline.target_qps = 1.0

# gpt-oss placeholder values
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing some config (see the file above to add the full list)
and interactive

@pgmpablo157321 @tanvi-mlcommons can we use gpt-oss-120b.Interactive now?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will move the gpt-oss fields to language/gpt-oss-120b/mlperf/user.conf and leave this file unchanged.
Let's continue the discussion on !2414.

@v-shobhit
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mrmhodak this is ready for your review.

Number of parallel workers for LiveCodeBench evaluation (default: 64)
--verbose Verbose logging

``` No newline at end of file
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One last thing to put the reference score (SGLang) and reference token number of the performance dataset, and #rows in performance and accuracy dataset here (I will upstream to submission checker)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Not a blocker, we can do in next PR)


logger.info(f"Results saved to: {output_path}")

logger.info("Evaluation complete!")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One comment (can move to next PR): we would need to print the final score to follow this regex:

"exact_match": r".*'exact_match':\s([\d.]+).*"

(as in submission checker)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants