Adapt to OCM spec for remote shares #57234
Open
+615
−29
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Enrique Pérez Arnaud <[email protected]>
enriquepablo
requested review from
come-nc,
icewind1991,
nfebe and
provokateurin
and removed request for
a team
…okens Signed-off-by: Enrique Pérez Arnaud <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Enrique Pérez Arnaud <[email protected]>
…h token rather that request Signed-off-by: Enrique Pérez Arnaud <[email protected]>
…ing a remote share Signed-off-by: Enrique Pérez Arnaud <[email protected]>
…en, it may be an access token Signed-off-by: Enrique Pérez Arnaud <[email protected]>
… get an access token to use as bearer token Signed-off-by: Enrique Pérez Arnaud <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Enrique Pérez Arnaud <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Enrique Pérez Arnaud <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #57152 #57166
Summary
This is a preliminary PR for discussion. If this goes through there are some things missing with which we'll be grateful to get some guidance:
There is also the question that for access tokens, we are keeping a reference to the corresponding refresh token in the uid field of the access token db record.