-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
Add nrf_cc310_platform library #10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Cargo.toml
Outdated
| description = "Rust bindings to the Nordic nRF91* Socket Library." | ||
| readme = "README.md" | ||
| license-file = "LICENCE.md" | ||
| license-file = "LICENSE.md" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why the change? It was correct
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That was just the spelling, this does not necessarily need to be in this pull request.
README.md
Outdated
| ## License | ||
|
|
||
| Any of the code outside the `./third_party` folder is under the [Blue Oak | ||
| Licence](./LICENCE.md). Any code inside the `./third_party` folder (include | ||
| the Nordic nrfxlib) has its own LICENCE file. | ||
| License](./LICENSE.md). Any code inside the `./third_party` folder (include | ||
| the Nordic nrfxlib) has its own LICENSE file. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This wasn't a spelling mistake. This repo was started by a Brit and 'licence' is the way you write it in british. Please revert
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok
Cargo.toml
Outdated
|
|
||
| [features] | ||
| default = ["llvm-objcopy"] | ||
| default = ["llvm-objcopy", "nrf9160"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While nice for nrf9160 users, this is a slight annoyance for users of other chips. It was a deliberate decision to have it as it was
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oversight on my part.
|
Modifications as requested. |
No description provided.