-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
fix(k8sobjectsreceiver): restart watch on unexpected channel close #43974
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Utkarsh9571
wants to merge
3
commits into
open-telemetry:main
Choose a base branch
from
Utkarsh9571:fix-watch-restart
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+10
−1
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Utkarsh9571 Why are we sleeping here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nevermind, got it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
May ask that too :)? Is this supposed to give time to the watcher to start? I don't see why is needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ChrsMark looking at PR description, it looks like this is adding some sort of backoff before retrying immediately.
@Utkarsh9571's comment:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think we will be okay without it, but I'll let @Utkarsh9571 reply to your question before proceeding.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, thank's for elaborating! My question then is if that's actually needed. It looks a bit arbitrary tbh and I'm not sure if it solves an existing problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ChrsMark @VihasMakwana I'm happy to clarify.
The
time.Sleep(2 * time.Second)is a minimal backoff to prevent tight restart loops when the channel closes silently. Without it, the receiver can enter a rapid retry cycle that floods logs and consumes CPU unnecessarily, especially in edge cases where the watcher fails to initialize cleanly.This sleep gives the receiver a moment to reset before retrying. It’s not about waiting for the watcher to start — it’s about avoiding aggressive retries when
doneis false due to a silent failure.I added it, the
time.Sleep(2 * time.Second)was my interpretation of how to avoid tight restart loops after a silent channel close. It wasn’t directly requested by @atoulme, but I added it based on observed behavior during testing, where the receiver would retry rapidly without delay.Let me know your preference and I’ll update the patch accordingly.