Skip to content

Conversation

@josephdrichard
Copy link
Contributor

/hold to fix mod

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dougbtv and zshi-redhat December 9, 2025 01:07
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: josephdrichard

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 9, 2025
@josephdrichard josephdrichard changed the title Ntpfailover backport 418 OCPBUGS-66973: Ntpfailover backport 418 Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@josephdrichard: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66973, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.18.z" version, but no target version was set
  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66973 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.19.0, 4.19.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

/hold to fix mod

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@josephdrichard josephdrichard force-pushed the ntpfailover_backport_418 branch 2 times, most recently from d13592a to 0daeb36 Compare December 11, 2025 23:00
@josephdrichard
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 11, 2025
@josephdrichard josephdrichard force-pushed the ntpfailover_backport_418 branch from 0daeb36 to c6ea546 Compare December 11, 2025 23:39
Implement ntpfailover plugin to add support for failing over from GNSS
to NTP as a time source for setting the system clock, in order to ensure
at least some accuracy for the system clock even when GNSS is
unavailable.

When this plugin is enabled, phc2sys will be disabled upon loss of GNSS,
and reenabled once GNSS becomes available again.  Also, chronyd will be
set to offline when GNSS is available, and then back online when GNSS
stops being available.

Note that this is scoped to only allowing failover when GNSS is
configured as the primary source for the system clock, and does not
support failover from PTP to NTP.  Further work would be necessary to
enable such a feature.

Also add required interfaces to plugin framework and throughout daemon
code to support this implementation.

.

.
@josephdrichard josephdrichard force-pushed the ntpfailover_backport_418 branch from c6ea546 to 42528ec Compare December 11, 2025 23:47
@josephdrichard
Copy link
Contributor Author

/verified later @klaskosk

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added verified-later verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria labels Dec 12, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@josephdrichard: This PR has been marked to be verified later by @klaskosk.

Details

In response to this:

/verified later @klaskosk

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 12, 2025

@josephdrichard: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@josephdrichard
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria verified-later

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants