Skip to content

OCPBUGS-78107: Disable sandboxed-containers in arm64 10#5754

Open
pablintino wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
pablintino:ocpbugs-78107
Open

OCPBUGS-78107: Disable sandboxed-containers in arm64 10#5754
pablintino wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
pablintino:ocpbugs-78107

Conversation

@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor

@pablintino pablintino commented Mar 10, 2026

Closes: #OCPBUGS-78107

- What I did

This change is to temporary disable the sandboxed-containers extensions in RHEL-10 ARM64 jobs as the main package it requires, kata-containers, is not yet part of the build.

- How to verify it

A CI run of periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.22-arm64-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview-1of3 with the [Machine Config Operator] [Other] Extensions from rhel9 stream to rhel10 stream test passing is enough to verify this change.

- Description for the changelog

This change is to temporary disable the sandboxed-containers extensions in RHEL-10 ARM64 jobs as the main package it requires, kata-containers, is not yet part of the build.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Updated test logic to properly handle ARM64 environments with RHEL10 OS image stream by excluding unsupported extension handling. This ensures tests accurately reflect platform-specific limitations and prevents false failures on affected configurations.

This change is to temporary disable the sandboxed-containers extensions
in RHEL-10 ARM64 jobs as the main package it requires, kata-containers,
is not yet part of the build.

Signed-off-by: Pablo Rodriguez Nava <git@amail.pablintino.eu>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 10, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pablintino: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78107, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Closes: #OCPBUGS-78107

- What I did

This change is to temporary disable the sandboxed-containers extensions in RHEL-10 ARM64 jobs as the main package it requires, kata-containers, is not yet part of the build.

- How to verify it

A CI run of periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.22-arm64-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview-1of3 with the [Machine Config Operator] [Other] Extensions from rhel9 stream to rhel10 stream test passing is enough to verify this change.

- Description for the changelog

This change is to temporary disable the sandboxed-containers extensions in RHEL-10 ARM64 jobs as the main package it requires, kata-containers, is not yet part of the build.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 10, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 87d6e4bf-a042-4946-9e87-f299897931ae

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a8a698 and 8e3da04.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/extended-priv/machineconfigpool.go

Walkthrough

Adds a conditional path in the FilterExtensions function to exclude the sandboxedContainersExtension on ARM64 systems with RHEL10 OS image stream. The extension is removed from the filtered set with a logged message indicating temporary lack of support.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
ARM64 Platform Exclusion Logic
test/extended-priv/machineconfigpool.go
Adds conditional branch to skip sandboxedContainersExtension for ARM64 with RHEL10 OS image stream, logging a message about temporary lack of support and removing the extension from the filtered set.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically references the Jira issue (OCPBUGS-78107) and describes the main change: disabling sandboxed-containers on ARM64 with RHEL 10.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed The pull request does not add or modify any Ginkgo test names with dynamic content. The only test using the modified FilterExtensions function has a stable test title with no dynamic information.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed The change modifies a helper function FilterExtensions, not Ginkgo test code. The file contains no Ginkgo test blocks, making this check inapplicable.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (2.5.0)

Error: can't load config: unsupported version of the configuration: "" See https://golangci-lint.run/docs/product/migration-guide for migration instructions
The command is terminated due to an error: can't load config: unsupported version of the configuration: "" See https://golangci-lint.run/docs/product/migration-guide for migration instructions


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pablintino: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78107, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
Details

In response to this:

Closes: #OCPBUGS-78107

- What I did

This change is to temporary disable the sandboxed-containers extensions in RHEL-10 ARM64 jobs as the main package it requires, kata-containers, is not yet part of the build.

- How to verify it

A CI run of periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.22-arm64-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview-1of3 with the [Machine Config Operator] [Other] Extensions from rhel9 stream to rhel10 stream test passing is enough to verify this change.

- Description for the changelog

This change is to temporary disable the sandboxed-containers extensions in RHEL-10 ARM64 jobs as the main package it requires, kata-containers, is not yet part of the build.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
  • Updated test logic to properly handle ARM64 environments with RHEL10 OS image stream by excluding unsupported extension handling. This ensures tests accurately reflect platform-specific limitations and prevents false failures on affected configurations.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.22-arm64-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview-1of3

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 10, 2026

@pablintino: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.22-arm64-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview-1of3

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/19102ae0-1c99-11f1-823c-02fc6b3b885c-0

Copy link
Member

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 10, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: isabella-janssen, pablintino

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [isabella-janssen,pablintino]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 10, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 10, 2026
@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.22-arm64-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview-1of3

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 10, 2026

@pablintino: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.22-arm64-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview-1of3

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/e5d00ae0-1cae-11f1-98f8-38fbd8980829-0

@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 11, 2026

@pablintino: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op-ocl 8e3da04 link false /test e2e-gcp-op-ocl

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.22-arm64-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview-1of3
/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 11, 2026

@pablintino: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.22-arm64-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview-1of3

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/5f430a50-1d34-11f1-8b3b-39fc36214a6d-0

@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.22-arm64-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview-1of3
/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 11, 2026

@pablintino: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.22-arm64-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview-1of3

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/58742840-1d51-11f1-8306-f2499d45658c-0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants