Skip to content

[ci] Update PR validation workflow - #236

Merged
nemesifier merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/update-pr-validation-workflow
Jul 30, 2026
Merged

[ci] Update PR validation workflow#236
nemesifier merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/update-pr-validation-workflow

Conversation

@nemesifier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Checklist

  • I have read the OpenWISP Contributing Guidelines and OpenWISP Anti AI Spam Policy.
  • N/A. This GitHub Actions caller-workflow change has no local manual execution path.
  • N/A. No application code changed.
  • N/A. No user-facing behavior or documentation changed.

Reference to Existing Issue

Related to openwisp/openwisp-utils#716

Description of Changes

Adds edited and ready_for_review pull request events so the shared workflow promptly revalidates changed descriptions. Makes the concurrency key PR-specific so newer events cancel outdated validation runs.

Screenshot

N/A. This is a GitHub Actions workflow-only change.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8a1521a5-8ea6-47e1-a2e4-ea0d71d4ce2e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b73540f and 01acfc7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/bot-autoassign-pr-issue-link.yml
📜 Recent review details
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 zizmor (1.28.0)
.github/workflows/bot-autoassign-pr-issue-link.yml

[error] 7-7: overly broad permissions (excessive-permissions): issues: write is overly broad at the workflow level

(excessive-permissions)


[warning] 7-7: permissions without explanatory comments (undocumented-permissions): needs an explanatory comment

(undocumented-permissions)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/bot-autoassign-pr-issue-link.yml (1)

4-4: LGTM!

Also applies to: 9-10


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request automation workflow now triggers for edited and ready_for_review events. Its concurrency group no longer includes the event action, so runs for the same pull request and repository share one concurrency group across different actions.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 8
✅ Passed checks (8 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title is descriptive and matches the workflow validation changes in the PR.
Description check ✅ Passed The description clearly matches the workflow trigger and concurrency updates in the changeset.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Bug Fixes ✅ Passed Workflow-only GitHub Actions change; the regression-test requirement is impractical here and the PR touches no core user-facing code.
Features ✅ Passed Workflow-only change in .github/workflows; no feature-request issue, docs, tests, or UI artifacts are applicable.
Changes ✅ Passed Workflow-only change; CI only covers site build/QA, and there’s no workflow-specific docs, UI, or public API to update.
General Rules ✅ Passed Workflow-only change matches the stated objective; no policy, security, performance, docs, or testing issues are evident in the modified file.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch ci/update-pr-validation-workflow

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@nemesifier
nemesifier merged commit 0192dd4 into master Jul 30, 2026
6 checks passed
@nemesifier
nemesifier deleted the ci/update-pr-validation-workflow branch July 30, 2026 23:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant