Enhance issue report template with new inputs

[Jaajees]

Added input fields for extra features and compatibility modes in the issue report template.

Pull Request checklist

Note: these are not necessarily requirements

• I reformatted the code with clang-format
• I checked to make sure my submission worked
• I am the author of submission or have permission from the original author
• Requires update of the PS2SDK or other dependencies
• Others (please specify below)

Pull Request description

Add more fields on template issue

• Extra Features
• Compatibility Modes

@J013k old suggestion

[israpps]

better make them dropdowns

reference
https://github.com/israpps/SC2MAKER/blob/main/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/issue.yml?plain=1#L35-L48

[Jaajees]

Dropdowns they would limit the choices

I myself use GSM, PADEMU and VMC simultaneously in some games.

[israpps]

it makes sure the user selects actual features, and it can be configured for both single or multi selection

[Jaajees]

Perhaps checkboxes would be better in this context.

[Jaajees]

@israpps

Looks good to me.
Any other suggestions?

[Jaajees]

What do you think @AKuHAK

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Enhances the GitHub issue report form by capturing additional configuration details that are commonly needed to triage OPL issues.

Changes:

• Added a multi-select dropdown for enabled extra features (e.g., VMC/PADEMU/GSM).
• Added an input field for reporting tested compatibility modes.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

Line contains trailing whitespace on an otherwise blank line. This adds noise to diffs and can cause unnecessary merge conflicts; please remove the whitespace-only line (or make it a truly empty line).

Suggested change

[Copilot]

Minor grammar/consistency: consider using “e.g.” instead of “eg” in the placeholder, and phrasing the description as a question (e.g., ending with a “?”) since other fields use question-style prompts.

Suggested change

	description: Which compatibility modes were tested.
	placeholder: "eg: mode 6, 6+3, 1+3+6..."
	description: Which compatibility modes were tested?
	placeholder: "e.g. mode 6, 6+3, 1+3+6..."

[J013k]

Is there a chance to also add these questions as mandatory?
There will not be a chance to create an issue without it.

I mean at least these fields:

Because when I see a report with almost all No response fields it is hard to figure it out with what we are dealing with:

Additionally most of these report are pointless, because if someone do not give a d*** to fill them,
in 99% it is an end user fault with an ISO or a device not OPL.

PS: I almost forgot, what about also add a field with Game ID e.g. What is your game ID? E.g. SLES_500.01.

[Jaajees]

@J013k , @AKuHAK

Now, all fields are required

The reference to the latest stable version or repository versions on MEGA are really necessary?
In the end we will always we will ask the user to test on the latest version.