Improving the adoc example for Commands in code blocks #549
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
IngridT1
approved these changes
Nov 24, 2025
Collaborator
IngridT1
left a comment
IngridT1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
But I would like to get one more approval before I merge.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the current rendering of https://redhat-documentation.github.io/supplementary-style-guide/#commands-in-code-blocks , the "Example asciidoc" displays as 3 separate codeblocks, which is confusing and does not reflect the contents of the codeblocks being used sequentially in the same adoc module.
This rewrite aims to fix that by ensuring that there is just one code block instead of 3.