Set up CI with Azure Pipelines

[sahiixx]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Configured automated build and deployment pipeline with continuous integration support.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new Azure DevOps pipeline configuration file is added for a Node.js project. The pipeline triggers on commits to main, provisions Node.js 20.x, and runs npm install followed by npm run build.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
CI/CD Pipeline Configuration azure-pipelines.yml	New Azure DevOps pipeline definition for Node.js project with Ubuntu agent, Node.js 20.x setup, and npm install/build commands

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A pipeline springs to life, so new and bright,
Building Node with npm, set it right,
On main it triggers, ubuntu's the way,
The project now has CI/CD to play! 🚀

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The PR title "Set up CI with Azure Pipelines" directly and clearly summarizes the main change in the changeset, which is the addition of a new azure-pipelines.yml configuration file for setting up continuous integration. The title is concise, specific, and accurately reflects the primary objective of the pull request without vague language or unnecessary details. A reviewer scanning the history would immediately understand that this PR introduces CI/CD pipeline configuration using Azure Pipelines.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch azure-pipelines

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

azure-pipelines.yml (1)

18-21: Consider adding npm dependency caching for faster builds.

Repeated pipeline runs will re-download all npm dependencies, increasing build times. Azure Pipelines supports caching, which would significantly improve CI efficiency.

Apply this diff to add npm caching:

 - task: NodeTool@0
   inputs:
     versionSpec: '20.x'
   displayName: 'Install Node.js'
+
+- task: Cache@2
+  inputs:
+    key: 'npm | "$(Agent.OS)" | package-lock.json'
+    path: $(npm_config_cache)
+    cacheHitVar: CACHE_RESTORED
+  displayName: 'Cache npm packages'
 
 - script: |
     npm install
     npm run build
   displayName: 'npm install and build'

Alternatively, if a simpler approach is preferred, add the --prefer-offline flag to npm install to use cached packages when available.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e0c558f and a5b37e5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• azure-pipelines.yml (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

azure-pipelines.yml (2)

1-21: Solid foundation for CI with Azure Pipelines.

The pipeline correctly triggers on main, provisions Node.js 20.x, and runs the build. YAML structure and syntax are sound.

---

15-15: No action needed—Node.js 20.x is appropriately specified.

The project does not have a .nvmrc file, .node-version file, or engines field in package.json. The hardcoded versionSpec: '20.x' in azure-pipelines.yml is the appropriate way to specify Node.js version for this CI/CD pipeline.

[sahiixx]

Ok