Use gh to create a release instead of a custom action#11
Merged
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR replaces the third-party ncipollo/release-action@v1 with the native GitHub CLI (gh) for creating releases, improving supply chain security by reducing dependency on external actions.
Key changes:
- Removed the
ncipollo/release-action@v1action dependency - Implemented
gh release createcommand directly in a run step
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
8828d80 to
2c83174
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
2c83174 to
71d7f8f
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should be more secure I guess (supply chain attacks and whatnot).