-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ACM-26213 note about fail-over #8417
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 2.15_stage
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
1fd833d
32d748f
30e4dbd
c2517dc
23f651e
2b47d81
aadb64f
668f58e
8136118
bd2b55b
6bba7a1
3424691
f99b23a
59dbe1e
bac84b8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,11 +1,13 @@ | ||
| [#general-support] | ||
| = General support | ||
|
|
||
| Red Hat supports only the Gatekeeper Operator and does not support individual Gatekeeper policies. Support ensures that the operator is functioning. To receive support, you need a {acm} or {ocp} Plus subscription for installing Gatekeeper and applying Gatekeeper policies to your cluster. | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Instead of listing this as an Important note in the overview, I suggest we add it here to the General support file |
||
|
|
||
| To understand the support you receive from the {gate}, see the following list: | ||
|
|
||
| - Supports current version of the {gate}, preceding versions, and all z-stream releases of those versions. | ||
| - Receive maintenance support and relevant security vulnerability fixes for preceding and current versions. | ||
| - Support for all {ocp} versions that receive standard support. | ||
| *Note*: The {gate} is not supported on end-of-life {ocp-short} versions or versions that receive extended support. | ||
|
|
||
| To view the release notes for the {gate}, see link:https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/gatekeeper/gatekeeper-operator-bundle/64ba9da52b6048f1d6695232[gatekeeper-operator-bundle]. | ||
| To view the release notes for the {gate}, see link:https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/gatekeeper/gatekeeper-operator-bundle/64ba9da52b6048f1d6695232[gatekeeper-operator-bundle]. | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -8,12 +8,10 @@ The {gate} installs Gatekeeper, which is a validating webhook with auditing capa | |
| - Evaluate Kubernetes resource compliance requests for the Kubernetes API by using the Gatekeeper constraints. | ||
| - Use OPA as the policy engine and use Rego as the policy language. | ||
|
|
||
| *Prerequisite:* You need a {acm} or {ocp} Plus subscription to install Gatekeeper and apply Gatekeeper policies to your cluster. | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why is the subscription requirement being removed? It seems to me it's still relevant?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It is removed because this is not a task file. I will add it to the file where it applies. making a few more commits
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sure, I get that it's not a task file, but it does seem more relevant to me in the overview since users would acquire the subscription before looking at how to install or configure it, right? So maybe this content can just move under the new "Important" heading?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I moved it to the General Support topic. We can do a live review so that I can explain my changes. |
||
|
|
||
| To learn more about using the {gate}, see the following resources: | ||
|
|
||
| - xref:../gatekeeper_operator/general_support.adoc#general-support[General support] | ||
| - xref:../gatekeeper_operator/channels.adoc#operator-channels[Operator channels] | ||
| - xref:../gatekeeper_operator/config_gk_operator.adoc#config-gk-operator[Configuring the {gate}] | ||
| - xref:../gatekeeper_operator/manage_gk.adoc#managing-gk-policies[Managing the {gate} installation policies] | ||
| - xref:../gatekeeper_operator/gk_policy_constraints.adoc#integrate-gk-constraints-templates[Integrating Gatekeeper constraints and constraint templates] | ||
| - xref:../gatekeeper_operator/gk_policy_constraints.adoc#integrate-gk-constraints-templates[Integrating Gatekeeper constraints and constraint templates] | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of adding the important note, I suggest we add it as a step. I created steps here to remove the callouts