Skip to content

Conversation

@hzcheng
Copy link
Contributor

@hzcheng hzcheng commented Nov 10, 2025

Description

Please briefly describe the code changes in this pull request.

Checklist

Please check the items in the checklist if applicable.

  • Is the user manual updated?
  • Are the test cases passed and automated?
  • Is there no significant decrease in test coverage?

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @hzcheng, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the robustness and observability of snapshot operations. It addresses a potential issue with inaccurate snapshot message size calculations by refining the size determination logic to consider all data characteristics. Additionally, it enhances debugging by adding a detailed log entry upon successful time-series data snapshot reads, providing crucial information about the virtual group and data size.

Highlights

  • Snapshot Message Size Calculation: The logic for calculating the size of block data within snapshots has been enhanced to accurately account for various data flags (HAS_NONE, HAS_NULL, HAS_VALUE) and variable data types, including their respective offsets. This change aims to prevent potential snapshot message size errors.
  • Enhanced Snapshot Read Logging: A new debug log message has been introduced for successful time-series data snapshot reads. This log now includes the virtual group ID (vgId) and the total size of the read data, providing better visibility and debugging capabilities for snapshot operations.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses a potential miscalculation of snapshot message sizes and adds a helpful debug log. The core change in tBlockDataSize correctly accounts for various column states, including nullability bitmaps and variable-length data offsets, which is a crucial fix. The new debug log in tsdbSnapReadTimeSeriesData will aid in monitoring and debugging. While the logic is sound, I've suggested a refactoring for the size calculation to improve its clarity and maintainability.

@hzcheng hzcheng merged commit d559065 into 3.3.6 Nov 11, 2025
11 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants