storage: Add API for RawKV GC

[pingyu]

Signed-off-by: pingyu [email protected]

What problem does this PR solve?

Add APIs for RawKV GC (storage part of #4866).
Issue Number: ref #4865
RFC: tikv/rfcs#90

What is changed and how does it work?

Add APIs for RawKV GC.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test

Code changes

• Has configuration change
  No.

• Has HTTP API interfaces changed (Don't forget to add the declarative for the new API)
  No.

• Has persistent data change
  No.

Side effects
No.

Related changes

• PR to update pingcap/docs/pingcap/docs-cn:
  No.
• PR to update pingcap/tiup:
  No.
• Need to cherry-pick to the release branch
  No.

Release note

Add APIs for RawKV GC.

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has not been approved.

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[pingyu]

/cc @nolouch @AndreMouche

[pingyu]

/cc @nolouch @AndreMouche

PTAL, thanks~

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4918 (0b2ec53) into master (c1ae899) will decrease coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 67.74%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4918      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.36%   75.28%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         296      298       +2     
  Lines       29441    29514      +73     
==========================================
+ Hits        22189    22219      +30     
- Misses       5322     5348      +26     
- Partials     1930     1947      +17     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	75.28% <67.74%> (-0.09%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
server/storage/endpoint/gc_safe_point.go	70.83% <ø> (ø)
server/storage/endpoint/gc_service_group.go	65.51% <65.51%> (ø)
server/storage/endpoint/key_path.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
server/tso/local_allocator.go	64.86% <0.00%> (-13.52%)	⬇️
server/tso/allocator_manager.go	63.39% <0.00%> (-5.16%)	⬇️
pkg/dashboard/adapter/manager.go	79.31% <0.00%> (-4.39%)	⬇️
pkg/etcdutil/etcdutil.go	85.05% <0.00%> (-3.45%)	⬇️
server/schedule/checker/merge_checker.go	69.92% <0.00%> (-2.88%)	⬇️
server/api/config.go	60.64% <0.00%> (-2.72%)	⬇️
server/schedule/labeler/rules.go	87.20% <0.00%> (-2.33%)	⬇️
... and 20 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c1ae899...0b2ec53. Read the comment docs.

[ti-chi-bot]

@pingyu: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.