Skip to content

Conversation

@muhammad-usama-sardar
Copy link
Contributor

(Follow-up of #1392) This should be correct now.
It is helpful at least as a reference key schedule for formal analysis.
Added text for similarity with Finished message, so that it is not misleading.

This should be correct now.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant