-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 330
Remove links to too old Editor's Draft in Understanding SC 4.1.2 #4261
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
Agree those resources are very outdated. Perhaps worth taking the opportunity to link to some more relevant materials, like |
|
patrickhlauke marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg. |
Co-authored-by: Patrick H. Lauke <[email protected]>
|
TF discussed adding https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/apg/ Also discussed whether to link to 1.1 or 1.2 for https://www.w3.org/TR/accname-1.2/ |
|
FWIW I checked with Daniel and he said we're better off linking to 1.2 in informative docs, even though it's a WD. Separately from this PR, we may want to update other references, since we link to just |
Added link to APG as well, as discussed. Think this is now ready to be sent to WG |
Just checking: is that because 1.2 is still WD? Could it perhaps be set up that there's a redirect from |
I checked with Daniel again and yes, 1.2 still being WD is the main reason, so this may resolve itself when it reaches CR (which they're working towards). |
Following related resources are too old:
EDIT (PHL): substituted with links to