Skip to content

Conversation

@yatil
Copy link
Contributor

@yatil yatil commented Apr 4, 2025

Very drafty Friday afternoon start of an improvement here.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit d6d1341
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/wcag2/deploys/6866558b8dd4550008aff80b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4316--wcag2.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

- Moving dialog example higher because it is more common
<p>The keyboard focus is not considered as trapped when the user can navigate away from a UI
component using the unmodified tab or arrow keys or when another “standard exit method” exists.
What is a “standard exist method” depends on the user’s hardware and software. A press
of the <kbd>ESC</kbd> key is such a “standard exit method”. When the press of the hardware back
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the "When" sentence doesn't quite work structure-wise



<p>The intent of this success criterion is to ensure that that content does not “trap” the
keyboard focus within subsections of content on a web page or app. It is common to restrict
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the "It is common..." insert here seems out of place. I'd move it to the next paragraph, and change this back to talking about the problem

@patrickhlauke
Copy link
Member

x-ref #4381

@yatil
Copy link
Contributor Author

yatil commented Jul 3, 2025

Thanks for the review and feedback, @patrickhlauke!

@w3cbot
Copy link

w3cbot commented Nov 2, 2025

patrickhlauke marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.

patrickhlauke added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2025
Ports over most of the ideas from #4316, but extends/clarifies them further.
@patrickhlauke
Copy link
Member

Closing this draft PR in favour of #4726 (as this PR here has conflicts, and it won't allow changes to be pushed to it)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants