Skip to content

Conversation

@spoutn1k
Copy link
Contributor

Use parameters to select the nature of the output metrics.

@spoutn1k spoutn1k requested a review from jgrund as a code owner September 26, 2025 04:27
@notion-workspace
Copy link

Explode lustre metrics

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 79.74684% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.98%. Comparing base (d39f692) to head (8dfabd0).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
lustrefs-exporter/src/routes.rs 78.78% 3 Missing and 11 partials ⚠️
lustrefs-exporter/src/main.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
lustrefs-exporter/src/metrics.rs 80.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #116      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.93%   93.98%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          44       43       -1     
  Lines        5573     5568       -5     
  Branches     5573     5568       -5     
==========================================
- Hits         5235     5233       -2     
+ Misses        269      266       -3     
  Partials       69       69              
Flag Coverage Δ
2_14_0_ddn133 34.79% <85.71%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
2_14_0_ddn145 35.78% <85.71%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
all-tests 93.98% <79.74%> (+0.04%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 26, 2025

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchspoutn1k/EHT-1238-explode-metrics
Testbedci-runner
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
nanoseconds (ns)
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
nanoseconds (ns)
(Limit %)
Upper Boundary
nanoseconds (ns)
(Limit %)
parse_benchmarks/combine_performance📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
127,450,000.00 ns
(-69.20%)Baseline: 413,832,500.00 ns
-1,042,182,282.94 ns
(-817.72%)
1,869,847,282.94 ns
(6.82%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 26, 2025

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchspoutn1k/EHT-1238-explode-metrics
Testbedci-runner

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds flag.

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkD1 Miss Ratemisses (%)D1mrmisses (reads) x 1e3D1mwmisses (writes) x 1e3DLmrmisses (reads)DLmwmisses (writes) x 1e3Drreads x 1e6Dwwrites x 1e6Estimated Cyclescycles x 1e6I1 Miss Ratemisses (%)I1mrmisses (reads) x 1e3ILmrmisses (reads)InstructionsBenchmark Result
instructions x 1e6
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
instructions x 1e6
(Limit %)
Upper Boundary
instructions x 1e6
(Limit %)
L1 Hit Ratehits (%)L1 Hitshits x 1e6LL Hit Ratehits (%)LL Hitshits x 1e3LL Miss Ratemisses (%)LLd Miss Ratemisses (%)LLi Miss Ratemisses (%)RAM Hit Ratehits (%)RAM Hitshits x 1e3Total read+writereads/writes x 1e6
lustre_metrics::memory_benches::bench_encode_lustre_metrics with_setup:generate_records()📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.92 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
24.89 reads x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
9.17 writes x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
108.00 reads📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
6.47 writes x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
2.49 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1.23 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
14.87 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.01 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1.01 reads x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
850.00 reads📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
10.79 x 1e6
(-30.92%)Baseline: 15.62 x 1e6
1.98 x 1e6
(18.36%)
29.25 x 1e6
(36.88%)
📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
99.76 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
14.47 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.19 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
27.63 x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.05 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.18 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.01 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.05 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
7.43 x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
14.51 x 1e6
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 26, 2025

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchspoutn1k/EHT-1238-explode-metrics
Testbedci-runner

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds flag.

Click to view all benchmark results
Benchmarkavg_runtime_rss_mibMeasure (MiB)avg_runtime_virtual_mibMeasure (MiB)end_rss_mibMeasure (MiB)end_virtual_mibMeasure (MiB)memory_growth_mibMeasure (MiB)peak_over_start_rss_ratioMeasure (units)peak_over_start_virtual_ratioMeasure (units)peak_rss_mibBenchmark Result
Measure (MiB)
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
Measure (MiB)
(Limit %)
Upper Boundary
Measure (MiB)
(Limit %)
peak_virtual_mibMeasure (MiB)start_rss_mibMeasure (MiB)start_virtual_mibMeasure (MiB)virtual_growth_mibMeasure (MiB)
scrape_allocations📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
43.79 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
878.39 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
43.88 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
878.51 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.33 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1.03 units📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1.02 units📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
45.72 MiB
(-54.56%)Baseline: 100.60 MiB
-168.67 MiB
(-368.94%)
369.88 MiB
(12.36%)
📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
878.82 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
43.54 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
873.16 MiB📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
5.35 MiB
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@spoutn1k spoutn1k force-pushed the spoutn1k/EHT-1238-explode-metrics branch from 6822dad to efb67b9 Compare September 26, 2025 15:37
@spoutn1k spoutn1k self-assigned this Oct 6, 2025
@spoutn1k spoutn1k force-pushed the spoutn1k/EHT-1238-explode-metrics branch from 7232228 to 5e1a788 Compare October 7, 2025 05:58
@spoutn1k spoutn1k force-pushed the spoutn1k/EHT-1238-explode-metrics branch from 5e1a788 to 98fd85c Compare October 23, 2025 09:19
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 23, 2025

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchspoutn1k/EHT-1238-explode-metrics
Testbedci-runner

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds flag.

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkD1 Miss Ratemisses (%)D1mrmisses (reads) x 1e3D1mwmisses (writes) x 1e3DLmrmisses (reads)DLmwmisses (writes) x 1e3Drreads x 1e6Dwwrites x 1e6Estimated Cyclescycles x 1e6I1 Miss Ratemisses (%)I1mrmisses (reads) x 1e3ILmrmisses (reads)InstructionsBenchmark Result
instructions x 1e6
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
instructions x 1e6
(Limit %)
Upper Boundary
instructions x 1e6
(Limit %)
L1 Hit Ratehits (%)L1 Hitshits x 1e6LL Hit Ratehits (%)LL Hitshits x 1e3LL Miss Ratemisses (%)LLd Miss Ratemisses (%)LLi Miss Ratemisses (%)RAM Hit Ratehits (%)RAM Hitshits x 1e3Total read+writereads/writes x 1e6
lustre_metrics::memory_benches::bench_encode_lustre_metrics with_setup:generate_records()📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.93 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
25.18 reads x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
9.22 writes x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
113.00 reads📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
6.45 writes x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
2.47 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1.23 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
14.82 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.01 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1.04 reads x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
869.00 reads📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
10.75 x 1e6
(-29.64%)Baseline: 15.28 x 1e6
1.99 x 1e6
(18.53%)
28.57 x 1e6
(37.63%)
📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
99.75 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
14.42 x 1e6📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.19 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
28.00 x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.05 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.18 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.01 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
0.05 %📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
7.43 x 1e3📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
14.46 x 1e6
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@spoutn1k spoutn1k force-pushed the spoutn1k/EHT-1238-explode-metrics branch from 98fd85c to 15cbb56 Compare October 23, 2025 12:47
@spoutn1k spoutn1k force-pushed the spoutn1k/EHT-1238-explode-metrics branch from 15cbb56 to ff94e98 Compare October 23, 2025 13:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants