Skip to content

feat: use restore plans in snapshot restore UI#1024

Closed
nicotsx wants to merge 1 commit into
feat/snapshot-restore-plan-apifrom
feat/snapshot-restore-ui-paths
Closed

feat: use restore plans in snapshot restore UI#1024
nicotsx wants to merge 1 commit into
feat/snapshot-restore-plan-apifrom
feat/snapshot-restore-ui-paths

Conversation

@nicotsx

@nicotsx nicotsx commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The restore routes and form should render from the same target-scoped
plan the server uses for execution. That keeps the client from guessing
the snapshot base, detecting Windows paths, or deciding original/custom
availability itself

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 614daa73-c83f-4b74-9c18-fe809753cd87

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

nicotsx commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@nicotsx nicotsx force-pushed the feat/snapshot-restore-plan-api branch from 18c6354 to a783bab Compare June 30, 2026 16:51
@nicotsx nicotsx force-pushed the feat/snapshot-restore-ui-paths branch 2 times, most recently from 1258f68 to c2918bd Compare June 30, 2026 16:55
@nicotsx nicotsx force-pushed the feat/snapshot-restore-plan-api branch from a783bab to e5c0ade Compare June 30, 2026 16:55
@nicotsx nicotsx force-pushed the feat/snapshot-restore-ui-paths branch from c2918bd to c574e37 Compare June 30, 2026 17:11
@nicotsx nicotsx force-pushed the feat/snapshot-restore-plan-api branch 2 times, most recently from 7b19d66 to 5525cf4 Compare June 30, 2026 17:22
@nicotsx nicotsx force-pushed the feat/snapshot-restore-ui-paths branch from c574e37 to 6d52ed5 Compare June 30, 2026 17:23
The restore routes and form should render from the same target-scoped
plan the server uses for execution. That keeps the client from guessing
the snapshot base, detecting Windows paths, or deciding original/custom
availability itself
@nicotsx nicotsx force-pushed the feat/snapshot-restore-plan-api branch from 5525cf4 to 5f53fd9 Compare June 30, 2026 18:51
@nicotsx nicotsx force-pushed the feat/snapshot-restore-ui-paths branch from 6d52ed5 to 19a7841 Compare June 30, 2026 18:51
@nicotsx nicotsx closed this Jun 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant